1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff who sells synthetic resin, etc. with the trade name of “C” has been supplying D (mutual name: E) with synthetic resin, etc. since about 10 years ago.

D After the marriage with the defendant and completing business registration (F) in the name of the defendant, the plaintiff requested that the defendant continue to supply synthetic resin, etc. in the future, and the plaintiff continued to supply synthetic resin, etc. to the defendant via D.

B. The Plaintiff and D set the due date for the payment of the goods supplied to the Defendant as the last day of the month following the month in which the goods were supplied.

C. The Plaintiff entered the details, value, and amount of reimbursement in the customer ledger prepared by the Plaintiff from the time of transaction with D, leading to the transaction with the Defendant, and entered the value-added tax amount separately at each time it issues a tax invoice to the Defendant, combining several recommendations transactions.

The plaintiff has issued tax invoices of 00 won for 7,941,000 won for 7,941,000 won for 7,000 won for 7,941,000 won for 7,000 won for 7,941,000 won for 2,340,000 won for 2,380,000 won for 120,0000 won for 40,000 won for 2,070,000 won for 2,340,000 won for 2,38,000,000 won for 120,000 won for 40,000 won for 40,000 won for 1,000 won for 40,505,000 won for 10,000 won for 1,000 won for 40,005 won for 5,005 won for 205 won for value-added