logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.01.14 2015나6098
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At around 23:40 on June 18, 2012, the Defendant: (a) heard the Plaintiff’s bath at the Plaintiff’s time when demanding the Plaintiff’s first class inside D heading in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C and 2 to make a view; (b) on the entrance of the said heading house, the Plaintiff saw the Plaintiff into a bath; and (c) at the entrance of the said heading house, the Plaintiff saw the Plaintiff into a breath, and caused the Plaintiff to inflict an injury, such as a satfing satto, etc., which requires six-day medical treatment.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

The defendant is above A.

On November 21, 2012, Seoul Central District Court Decision 2012 High Court Decision 201Da29340 Decided November 21, 2012, a summary order of KRW 3 million was issued, but the above summary order became final and conclusive as it did not request formal trial.

C. The plaintiff also and the above.

On November 21, 2012, the above summary order became final and conclusive as it was received by the Seoul Central District Court 201Da29340, Nov. 21, 2012, on the ground that the Defendant suffered bodily injury, such as salt, tension, etc., of the shouldered chills, which require treatment for about two weeks, by cutting off the balp with the Defendant, while balping the balp with each other, and cutting off the balp with the stairs.

From June 19, 2012 to July 10, 2013, the Plaintiff spent KRW 679,280 in total as medical expenses to treat the injury caused by the instant accident.

【Ground for recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 4 (including each number, hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul's evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the above facts of recognition as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident in this case, since the plaintiff and the defendant were dissatisfied with the plaintiff and suffered injury to the plaintiff as he did not go beyond the stairs under the direction of the plaintiff.

B. The defendant's assertion is judged.

arrow