1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following judgments, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. The Plaintiff asserts that, even if E is a contracting party to the interior works with the Defendants, the Plaintiff, a spouse of E, is jointly and severally liable pursuant to Article 832 of the Civil Act, and thus, the Plaintiff may be deemed a substantial party, and the Defendants jointly and severally shall compensate the Plaintiff for the damages caused by the interior works.

However, Article 832 of the Civil Act is merely a provision that provides joint and several liability for the obligations arising from a legal act of a married couple with respect to daily home affairs, and pursuant to the above provision, the plaintiff is jointly and severally liable for the legal act related to the daily home affairs of E which

Even if E is a contracting party, the plaintiff can not be considered as a party to the interior contract.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

3. If so, all of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.