A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Punishment of the crime

On October 18, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to two years and two months of imprisonment with prison labor for assault, etc. at Daejeon District Court on April 11, 2019 and completed the execution of the sentence in a astronomical prison on April 11, 2019.

around 00:30 on November 27, 2019, the Defendant interfered with the main business of the victim by force by avoiding disturbance for about 20 minutes, such as the payment of alcohol value, etc. from the main points of the trade name “D,” operated by the victim C (V) of the victim C (V) in the Gangnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on November 27, 2019.

At around 17:00 on December 9, 2019, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the 200,000 won of the market value on the table to the floor by breaking the 120,000 won of the market value on the table, on the ground that the victim refused to present his/her proposal while communicating with the victim in connection with a gene analysis project with the victim in the G office work of the victim F (the age of 60) in the south-dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Seoul.

around 22:20 on December 16, 2019, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s main duty of operation by force for about 15 minutes, while drunkd from the “Jju shop” in the operation of the victim I (n, 69 years of age) in Y in Y in Yannam-gu, Dongan-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul. In doing so, the Defendant expressed the victim’s bath at large interest, and opened the table above the table, and interfered with the victim’s main duty of operation by force.

[200 Highest 572]

1. Around 03:50 on November 13, 2019, the Defendant was provided with an entertainment drinking club operated by Dong-gu, Dong-gu, Dong-gu, and the victim L with the intent or ability to pay the purchase price, and acquired the purchase price by taking the order with a total of KRW 1,50,000,000, including the alcohol, the alcohol, and the reception room.

2. The Defendant who caused property damage, while drinking alcohol at the time and place set forth in paragraph (1), has a defect in calculating the drinking value, caused his/her failure to wear his/her behavior.