The defendant successively connects the plaintiff with each point of the indication 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 of the annexed drawings of the Seo-gu Seoul District.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 10, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) successively connected the Defendant with each point of the attached Table 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju; and (b) successively leased part of 628 square meters in the ship with each point of 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13, and 8 of the same drawings among the 2,222 square meters in D; and (c) the portion of 419.5 square meters in the ship (hereinafter “each land of this case”) connected each point of 419.5 square meters in sequence from June 27, 2016 to June 26, 2018, as KRW 24 months in the lease deposit, KRW 30 million in the lease deposit, and value-added tax (value-added tax separately).

B. At the time of the conclusion of the above lease agreement, the Defendant did not pay the remainder lease deposit of KRW 27 million and KRW 2.2 million monthly rent, as well as KRW 3 million paid as the down payment at the time of the conclusion of the said lease agreement. The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the Defendant on the claim against the Gwangju District Court for land delivery, etc.

The instant case was brought to conciliation by the Gwangju District Court 2016ss.665, and on March 21, 2017, the Defendant paid KRW 40 million to the Plaintiff on March 31, 2017, the amount of KRW 20 million from June 27, 2016 to April 26, 2017 (the amount of KRW 21 million from April 27, 2017 to June 26, 2018 - the amount of KRW 3 million paid).

2. If the defendant did not pay the above money by the above deadline, the land of this case shall be transferred to the plaintiff and the 22 million won shall be paid to the plaintiff.

‘' has been concluded the adjustment of the contents.

C. The Defendant paid KRW 40 million to the Plaintiff on March 31, 2017 pursuant to the aforementioned adjustment clause, but did not pay the value-added tax of KRW 4 million to be paid separately.

On March 27, 2018, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the transfer of each of the instant land on June 26, 2018, for which the contract term expires, as there is no intent to renew the lease contract. However, the Defendant requested the renewal of the contract and refused to deliver each of the instant land.

Accordingly, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against the defendant in Gwangju District Court 2018Kadan520903 on December 17, 2018.