All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the Defendant’s ground of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, it is justifiable for the lower court to have found the Defendant guilty of all of the charges charged of forging private documents, uttering of documentary evidence, and lease cars, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning. In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence, or omitting

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor in light of the records, it is justifiable for the lower court to have maintained the first instance judgment that found the Defendant not guilty of the fraud of the borrowed money among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds as stated in its reasoning, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, exceeding the bounds of the principle of logic

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.