beta
Text
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Relevant Defendants C, D, E, F, G, H, and I are the occupants of J apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”), the Plaintiff entered into an employment contract with the Defendant J apartment council (hereinafter “Defendant’s council”) on September 3, 2012 and worked as the head of the management office, and the Plaintiff B was the chairman of the Defendant J apartment council (hereinafter “Defendant’s council”)’s council of occupants’ representatives.
B. On August 18, 2014, the head of Seocho-gu Office imposed an administrative fine of KRW 3,00,000 on Plaintiff A on the ground of a violation described in the separate sheet No. 1. Plaintiff A filed an objection on September 15, 2014. On November 11, 2014, the Daejeon District Court rendered a decision to impose an administrative fine of KRW 3,000,000 on Plaintiff A (20,612), but the Plaintiff filed an objection against the decision on the administrative fine of KRW 3,00,000 on Plaintiff on November 14, 2014, and rendered a decision not to impose an administrative fine of KRW 3,00,00 in consideration of all circumstances, such as the circumstances of the violation, although it is recognized that the violation was committed on December 29, 2014.
In addition, on May 13, 2015, the head of Seoan-si Office imposed an administrative fine of KRW 3,00,000 on the Plaintiff on the ground of a violation listed in the separate sheet No. 2 attached hereto. Plaintiff A filed an objection on June 1, 2015. On October 28, 2015, Daejeon District Court rendered a decision to impose an administrative fine of KRW 3,000,000 upon Plaintiff A (2015, 2214). However, Plaintiff A filed an objection against the decision on administrative fine of KRW 3,00,000 (2015, 2214) on Plaintiff A on November 6, 2015 and rendered a decision not to impose an administrative fine in consideration of all the circumstances of the violation, even if it is recognized on December 8, 2015.
C. Article 34(1) of the Management Rules of the apartment that delayed the election of the defendant's representative council shall be commissioned by the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives, and where the council of occupants' representatives is not constituted, it shall be commissioned.