logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.11.27 2014고단1371
상해등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, only one hundred thousand won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 15, 2014, at around 22:35, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement of drinking level) without justifiable grounds, the Defendant was arrested from the above police officers as a flagrant offender in violation of the Road Traffic Act, and was compelled to comply with a drinking test by inserting the breath under the influence of alcohol, such as D, and slope E in the front of the official fire fighting box in the front of the official fire fighting box in the city of Ansan-si, Ansan-si. The Defendant made a statement of an witness who was in excess of the breath while driving the breath under the influence of alcohol, and breathing on the Defendant’s entrance, and breathing on the face while driving the breath in the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant did not comply with a request for a drinking test by inserting the breath under the influence of alcohol without justifiable grounds. The Defendant was arrested from the above police officers to the C district as a flagrant offender in violation of the Road Traffic Act, and did not comply with the request by means of drinking level.

2. At around 22:40 on June 15, 2014, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) on the front of the said public fire fighting box, by the police officer D, and by the slope E, and boarded the front seat of the patrol vehicle and escorting it to the district C. On the following occasions, the Defendant obstructed legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a police officer by assaulting the victim, such as walking the left face part of the guard D, who is the victim of the patrol vehicle, on two occasions, and interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender, and at the same time, boomed the victim with snow pool and surrounding eyes that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to medical certificates, on-site photographs, reports on the assignment of drivers, and reports on the status of drivers, executive status, and statement;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 2 and Article 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act (a point of refusal of the measurement of noise) concerning the facts constituting the crime, and the Criminal Act;

arrow