All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant filed an appeal on the grounds that the lower court’s punishment is too unfluent and unfair, on the grounds that the Defendant was too unfluent and unfair.

2. The crime of this case, while the defendant was driving an urban bus, is deemed to have suffered injury in need of approximately eight weeks of medical treatment by shocking the injured party who was driving Oral lebane while driving the urban bus. The nature and circumstances of the crime of this case are to be light.

subsection (b) of this section.

However, this case is an accident where the signal was changed to the yellow signal immediately before the entry into the intersection while the defendant was normally driving in the direct margin signals, and the victim who was making a left-hand turn from the two-lanes of the road immediately later than the intersection was shocked, and the victim's negligence is deemed to have been a considerable cause for the occurrence of the accident in this case, and there are some circumstances considering the circumstances leading up to the crime.

Since the bus operated by the defendant is insured by the bus mutual aid association, the victim seems to be able to receive compensation for medical expenses in the future.

There is no criminal history exceeding a fine.

In full view of all the conditions of sentencing as shown in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and circumstance leading to the crime of this case, and circumstances before and after the crime, the lower court's punishment is deemed to be too heavy or unbrupted and unfair.

All the arguments of the defendant and the prosecutor shall not be accepted.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.