1. The Defendant’s KRW 36,00,000 as well as 5% per annum from May 1, 2015 to September 23, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

1. The Plaintiff is a person engaged in credit business. The Defendant, as a licensed real estate agent, did not have leased a house from D and nameless boxes, etc., who are engaged in real estate brokerage business after opening and registering a real estate brokerage office in Bupyeong-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul (Seoul Metropolitan Government F apartment 142 Dong 702). However, the Defendant planned to acquire money by means of a false lease contract. On December 20, 2012, upon requesting the Defendant to prepare a lease contract (lease), the Defendant did not have been requested by the owner, etc. of the above house before receiving D and did not have confirmed the actual status of the above house, and did not have any way to verify whether the said house was actually received the down payment. The Plaintiff prepared a lease contract (lease) with a deposit certificate of KRW 200 million (including a deposit certificate of KRW 200 million) and a deposit certificate of KRW 200 million (300 million) with a deposit certificate of KRW 200,000,000).

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, the Defendant violated the obligations under the Acts and subordinate statutes relating to real estate brokerage business by preparing and delivering a lease contract and a confirmation and explanatory note of the object of brokerage, which entered as if the lease contract was concluded by the broker as if it had not been concluded by its own brokerage (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da78863, 7870, May 13, 2010).