logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.01.29 2014나2015475
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs who are ordered to pay additional amounts below.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Police officers, etc. belonging to the Armed Forces, such as the Republic of Korea Armed Forces, Gyeongnam-gun, Hodong-gun, Hadong-gun, and Cheongsan-gun, etc., who had been conducting as soon as possible the cryptic operations in the Dogsan District prior to the Korean War, were killed under the command of preliminary inspection and suspicion of subscopic charges, etc., from around 1948 to around 1953 by civilians engaged in agriculture unrelated to the scopic activities.

B. At the time of the Chuncheon case on the south-west of the Sasan-gun, Sasan was “Mayang-gun, Chuncheon.”

On August 31, 1949, the police, which became aware of the fact that the downage and residents caused their animals and brought their food to them, had 7 residents go to the police station in the Switzerland, and had saak field from the elementary school following the Chuncheon.

In addition, after about 20 days of the occurrence of the above case, the police again conducted the village youth in the above Chuncheon, and then died at the head of the Simsan, the head of the Simsan.

(hereinafter referred to as “the case of sacrifice by the civilian in the window”).

Plaintiff

A In accordance with the Framework Act on the Settlement of History for Truth and Reconciliation (hereinafter “Committee”), the State Armed Forces and the police conducted the primary duty of protecting the lives and property of the people, and filed an application for the determination of victims of the civilian sacrifice in the Seocho-do area, including the case of the so-called So-nam Civilian sacrifice in the Republic of Korea on June 30, 2010, for the primary duty of protecting the lives and property of the people, the State Armed Forces and the police murdered in the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “Commission”) without undergoing lawful procedures, such as the so-called “the so-called “the so-called the so-called “the so-called “the so-called” and “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called”), and the so-called “the so-called “the so-called “the so-called”).

arrow