logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.29 2015가단5379591
양수금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A’s KRW 48,400,00 and for this, KRW 5% per annum from March 31, 2015 to March 12, 2016.

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the change in the specification of the claim;

(However, "creditor" is deemed to be "Plaintiff", "debtor" to be "Defendant", and with respect to debtor C, the payment order was finalized prior to the implementation of the lawsuit in this case. The plaintiff reduced the claim for damages for delay, such as Paragraph (1) of the Disposition at the first date for pleading. The ground for recognition on February 2.

(a) Defendant;

1. A judgment by public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act);

B. Defendant

2. Judgment on deemed confession B (Article 208(3)2 and Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act): The Defendant is served with the original copy of the payment order and submitted a formal written objection and a written answer; the Plaintiff did not submit a substantive written answer disputing the Plaintiff’s claim thereafter; and the Plaintiff did not appear on the date for pleading; thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion is deemed to have been led to the confession in all of the allegations).

arrow