1. The Defendant’s corporate tax of KRW 9,828,562,270 for the business year 2006 against the Plaintiff on April 29, 2010.

.1,626,00,00 1,626,00,007 retired executives and non-deductible expenses, such as management advisory fees, 73,30,259, 452, 304, 438 676,000,200 2,201,604,697 and 13,571, 380,380, 470,640,647, 397, 306368, 1748, 170, 6848, 696, 174, 70, 1782, 80, 275, 200, 410, 15, 2896, 208, 305, 1639, 208, 165, 294, 207, 16396, 2085, 2816

D. The Defendant imposed and collected corporate tax on June 1, 2007 and July 2, 2007, upon the revision of the above tax base, as follows.

Items 203 2004 2005 2006 2005 9,830,898,995 9,830,898,998,995 35,619,486 191,395,023 480,980,985 707,155,494 small 35,619,486 19,486 191,395,023 480,140,985 9,830,898,95 10,538,538,48,489,489 on June 27, 2007 207 2005 or 207.

* The reduction of three times after the Plaintiff reported corporate tax for the business year 2006 and the amount of loss brought forward on September 29, 2009 due to partial acceptance of the Plaintiff’s request by the Tax Tribunal, and the principal tax for corporate tax based on the above tax base became the tax amount for the year 2006.

E. On March 31, 2007, the Plaintiff filed a return on the tax base and amount of corporate tax for the business year 2006, and the tax base of corporate tax was KRW 931,203,302,692, and the tax amount was KRW 205,148,16,688 according to the reduction and correction three times thereafter and the Plaintiff’s partial acceptance by the Tax Tribunal on September 29, 2009.

F. The plaintiff B.

The defendant asserts that corporate tax in the business year 2006 should be reduced by KRW 9,828,562,285.