logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.02.05 2014고단8839 (1)
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

50,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 8839]

1. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on September 23, 2014, around the house of D in Kimhae-si, the Defendant sold to D approximately 0.05g 0.05g of psychotropic drugs, which was sold to D, for approximately KRW 50,000,00.

2. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on September 16, 2014, at around 22:30, the Defendant sold and purchased narcotics, etc. by selling approximately 0.3g gramlopon to D from “F China restaurant” operated by D in Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, and selling them for KRW 20,000,000.

3. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, around September 16, 2014, around 23:30, the Defendant administered narcotics, etc. in a manner that 0.05g of scopphones in the Defendant’s house located in Busan G, Busan, by drinking in water.

4. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on November 1, 2014, the Defendant administered approximately 0.05 grams in the same manner as in paragraph 3 at the same place.

5. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on November 5, 2014, the Defendant administered approximately 0.05 grams in the same manner as that of paragraph 3 at the same place.

[2014 Highest 10245]

1. On December 23, 2009, the Defendant forged private documents stated “H” in the driver’s column of the guard and traffic of the Busan Coast Guard Station and the traffic safety office of the traffic safety department, stated “H” in the driver’s column of the report on the driver’s report, stated “H” in the driver’s column of the protocol of suspect interrogation, and marked “H” in the witness and confirmation column of the protocol of suspect interrogation, and marked the Defendant’s seal next to each name.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, forged the driver's report on the state-owned driver's statement in the name of H, the driver's report on the state-employed driver's identity, the driver's statement of the suspect interrogation protocol, and the confirmation person's identity.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), forged the foregoing to police officers of the foregoing traffic safety system who are aware of the forgery.

arrow