1. The Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff is a law firm C with the executory power of March 30, 2016, No. 217.

1. Basic facts

A. On March 30, 2016, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entrusted a law firm C with the preparation of a notarial deed of a monetary loan agreement with the effect that a notary public would borrow KRW 6.8 million from the Defendant, and that the Plaintiff would make installment payments of KRW 500,000 from April 2016 to April 13, 2017 (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”).

B. The Plaintiff borrowed KRW 6,80,000 from the Defendant’s so-called “advance payment” to the entertainment drinking club (hereinafter “D”) operated by the Defendant as from April 4, 2016, and had the Defendant prepare the instant notarial deed by borrowing KRW 6,80,000 from the Defendant, and the Plaintiff worked at the instant main shop until June 6, 2016.

C. At the time when the Plaintiff worked at the instant main shop, the said main shop was engaged in sexual traffic, and female employees, including the Plaintiff, engaged in sexual traffic and received money for the purpose of preparing against the said entry, upon the request of the customers, while selling alcoholic beverages, such as the instant main shop. On May 4, 2016, it was discovered that there was an act of arranging sexual traffic at the instant main shop, and the Defendant was subject to an administrative disposition of the suspension of business on July 13, 2016 for three months (the fact that there was no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entry of Gap 1, 2, and 6, the fact inquiry results with respect to the voice head, and the purport of the entire pleadings as a whole.

2. Article 103 of the former Civil Code provides that "any juristic act with a content contrary to good morals and other social order shall be null and void." According to Article 10 (1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, a person who employs or recruits a person who has engaged in an act of arranging sexual traffic, etc., a person who has introduced or arranged such an occupation, or a person who has acquired human traffic for the purpose of sexual traffic, shall have a claim against the person who has conducted or is to conduct an act of selling sex.