The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (one year of imprisonment, and additional collection) is too unreasonable as the gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is that he will not me administer narcotics in the future when he made a confession and reflects in depth of all the crimes of this case.

However, the court below's decision that the defendant's wife had an intention to combine with the defendant's prior judgment. The defendant's family members, including his children, and his children wanted to leave the front phone, cooperates with the investigation by stating the person who supplied the phiphones, and deposited one million won each for the victims of violence at the court below's trial, which is favorable to the defendant, but the defendant was punished twice for the same kind of crime, and the defendant committed the crime of this case at the same time without being aware of the expiration of the term of punishment on March 20, 2013, even though he was released upon the expiration of the term of punishment on March 20, 201, the defendant committed the crime of this case at the same time during the repeated crime period, the defendant's maternity appraisal of the defendant, which was 4 to 5 cm length from the mother of the crime of this case, and it seems that the defendant continuously administered the mephonephones before the crime of this case, until the victims of the assault case and the victim of this case, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case's changes in the circumstances of this case's.

3. The appeal by the defendant is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal by the defendant is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.