logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2016.03.24 2015고단1127
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Attempted Crime] On October 10, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of fraud at the Suwon method, and on April 28, 2014, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence at the Seoul Southern Southern Detention Center.

[2015 Highest 1127]

1. On February 22, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B at the home of the Defendant in C Apartment 102 dong 904, and on February 22, 2015, even if he did not intend to sell the goods, he/she sold the Internet site on the Internet bulletin in the country’s bulletin board.

“The” posts a letter and reports it to the injured party B, “on the first hand, deliver the goods to the injured party B.”

“A false statement” was made.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 305,00 from the victim, to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (E) in the name of D around 01:29 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.

2. The Defendant committed a crime against the Victim F at the above time and at the above time at the victim F, who reported and contacted the Internet bulletin board of the Republic of Korea, using the above method, will give the victim F, who first remitted money, to the victim F.

“A false statement” was made.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received 300,000 won from the victim’s account (E) around 18:29 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim to take the property by deceiving the victim.

[2015 Highest 1225]

3. On October 15, 2014, the Defendant against the Victim G was at the I office of the Victim Operation Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., located in Yongsan-gu, Manyang-si, Manyang-si, and even if purchasing a middle and high smartphone, the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the purchase price. The Defendant would make payments by the date following the date on which the Defendant purchased a middle and high smartphone and exported it to China.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

As such, the Defendant deceivings the victim as such, and from October 15, 2014 to the victim, the Defendant from around October 15, 2014.

arrow