The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the court below rejected the credibility of each of the statements made by the defendant in H, E, and I or the court below on the ground that the defendant attended the council of occupants' representatives held around September 28, 201 on the basis of the record of the defendant's statement submitted by his/her defense counsel to the council of occupants' representatives held around September 28, 201, and rejected all of the credibility of each of the statements made by H, E, and I's investigative agencies or the court below, which correspond to the facts that the victim E, who is the head of the apartment management office, took the same bath as the facts charged, but the record (Evidence No. 9) was prepared on the basis of a meeting recorded about about about about 1 hour and recorded about 20 minutes among the above council of occupants' representatives' representatives, and determined that the court below rejected the credibility of each of the above statements made by the defendant, who had no choice but been misunderstanding of the victim's desire to leave the meeting room or interfere with the defendant's social position.

2. The facts charged in a criminal trial for judgment are the facts charged.