The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court reversed the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant on August 29, 2016, on the ground that “the victim was scambling on the floor and walking the victim’s body several times due to an outbreak, and forced towing the victim to get out of the entrance in order to let him out of the house, and then towing the victim out of the entrance, and then pushing the victim over the floor, thereby causing bodily injury, such as salt, tension, etc., for about two weeks of treatment,” and that the part of the charge of self-harm committed on July 29, 2016, deeming that there was no proof of a crime, and acquitted the Defendant on the charge of self-harm.

Examining the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence by violating logical and empirical rules or by misapprehending the legal doctrine, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.