1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 90,603,942 for the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from May 17, 2014 to February 2, 2015; and (b) February 3, 2015.

1. The Plaintiff’s loans of KRW 20 million to the Defendant on June 17, 201, KRW 20 million on January 18, 2012 (which appears to be erroneous on January 20, 201), KRW 18,000, KRW 2000 on September 18, 2012, KRW 20 million on November 24, 2012, KRW 300,000 on December 21, 2012, KRW 300,000 on December 30, 2012, KRW 301,000 on December 21, 201, and KRW 203,00,000 on May 28, 201, each of the above loans of KRW 300,000,000,000 on September 21, 203; and KRW 301,000,00 on May 28, 2013.

In addition, the Plaintiff asserts to the effect that it additionally lent KRW 500,000,000 to September 3, 2012 and KRW 240,000 on November 7, 2012. However, the Plaintiff’s assertion on this part is without merit, as there is no other evidence to acknowledge the fact of lending solely with the descriptions of evidence Nos. 5-1, 11, 13, and 14-1.

According to the above facts, barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the remainder of loans of KRW 70,603,942 (= KRW 20 million, KRW 20 million, KRW 20 million, KRW 300,000 KRW 301,600 KRW 201, KRW 214, KRW 342 million) minus KRW 10,000,000,000 KRW 300,000, KRW 201,600, KRW 214, KRW 342 million, which the Plaintiff was paid by the Defendant on August 10, 2012.

2. Judgment on the defendant's defense

A. As to the defense of repayment, the Defendant: (a) KRW 2 million on July 30, 201; (b) KRW 100,000 on September 6, 201; and (c) KRW 770,00 on June 28, 201.