beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. On January 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) entered a room in which singing rooms (e.g., e., singing rooms) are playing on the nine storys in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon; (b) and (c) the Defendant took a video screen; and (d) during a match, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s F monitors worth KRW 500,000 at the market price by cutting off the e-mail and cutting off the e-mail so far as possible; and (c) thus, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s e-mail amounting to KRW 50,000 at the market price.
2. Comprehensively taking account of the witness F, G’s respective legal statements, police interrogation protocol against E, the defendant entering a room where he was playing in the D musical room, who is not aware of it, and marked off with E in the said singing room 9 times. The defendant's singing monitor, etc., the defendant's singing monitor, and the monitor's flabing and pushed off, and the defendant's flabing, was pushed off. The defendant did not look into the flab of E, but was pushed into the flab, was pushed into the flab, and pushed into the flab, and was pushed.
E had different monitors at the time of the police investigation, and it was difficult for monitors to enter the nine rooms, and was not sealed before the monitor.
“The lower court made the statement.”
In addition, the room Nos. 9 was a small room of two meters from the table to the monitor.
Comprehensively taking account of the above facts, the Defendant was aware that the Defendant was tightly fighting in a narrow room E, and that the Defendant was aware of the fact that the monitor was subsequent to E and that the monitor would be damaged when the Defendant was pushed in E with each of the aforementioned evidence, pictures, and estimates.
It is insufficient to recognize.
In addition, there is no other evidence to acknowledge the intention of damage.
Ultimately, the facts charged of this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, acquitted by the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.