logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.04.18 2018가단20619
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The amount payable by the Plaintiff to the Defendant for the goods supplied by the Defendant is 20.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 4, around March 25, 2016, the plaintiff took over the business of "Emart" operated on the first floor of the building located in Osan-si D and operated the business of "Fem" until June 15, 2017. The plaintiff entered into a business transfer agreement with G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "Sem") on June 15, 2017, and transferred all of the rights, such as facilities, human resources, etc. to the non-party company. At the time of the above business transfer agreement, the plaintiff provided the non-party company with a list of accounts payable from the non-party company during the operation of the Empt to the non-party company, and then the plaintiff continued to pay the price of the goods to the non-party company or the non-party company's transferee of the goods after consultation with the non-party company to the non-party company, and the plaintiff was paid the price of the goods to the non-party 2.

As to this, the Defendant was unaware of the fact that the non-party company was taking over the business of the instant marina from the Plaintiff, and on November 2017.

arrow