logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.04.11 2013고단3461
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 8, 2006, the Defendant violated Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act by receiving a summary order of a fine of KRW 700,000,000 from the Busan District Court to a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) and a fine of KRW 1 million from the same court on November 3, 2008 to a fine of KRW 2,00,000,000 for the same crime, and is a person driving a vehicle B New A

On October 17, 2013, at around 00:05, the Defendant driven the said car at approximately KRW 200 meters from the front side of the Yandong-dong Corlleack cafeteria, Kimhae-si, to the front side of the same Sammundong-dong 2 Dong-dong Office in the same city, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.109% of blood alcohol content.

Summary of Evidence

1. Court statements and the first trial records of the accused;

1. No. 2-4 of the evidence list submitted by the prosecutor (hereinafter “verification”).

1. Previous convictions in judgment: the application of the Acts and subordinate statutes No. 6,7;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of a fine for the crime, and the selection of a fine;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (Article 55(1)3 of the Act on Discretionary Mitigation (Article 53 and 55(1)3 of the same Act (Article 55(1)3 of the same Act, except for those subject to a fine for drinking driving twice as stated in the judgment of the defendant, there are no records of punishment for drinking driving, and the last punishment for drinking driving is about five years prior to the fact that the defendant was punished for drinking driving, and the defendant is responsible for driving with two minor daughters, and the driver's license was revoked due to the instant crime, so that he could not engage

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more of the Criminal Act;

arrow