logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.10.24 2017고정1054
특수폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 14, 2017, the Defendant and B, within the main point of “D” located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, caused a dispute while drinking together with the victim E ( South, 54 years old) who was forced to sit together with the victim E ( South, 54 years old).

While the Defendant was in dispute with the victim as above, he saw the victim's face because of the fact that the victim was cushion in his face. While having been in dispute with the victim, the Defendant left the victim's body on the beer neck, which is a dangerous object on the table. However, the victim got out of the body and got the victim out of the spawn so as to prevent the swn the swn by the swn, the Defendant got out of the body part of the victim's body on the hand.

B continued to collect beer's disease, which is a dangerous object on the table, from the Defendant, the victim's inner part was flicked once, and the victim was flicked due to drinking and spawn, and the victim was flicked by the employees of the above main shop who had been employed.

Accordingly, the defendant and B conspiredd with the victim by carrying dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Each statement of E and F;

1. A report on occurrence;

1. On-site and photographs of the body of the victim;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant Article 261 of the Criminal Act, Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines for criminal facts, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects errors in the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the points agreed with the victim shall be considered as favorable circumstances. However, the fact that it is not good that the nature of the crime is not good, such as assaulting the victim with dangerous articles together with the accomplice and taking them into action, and other sentencing materials recorded in the record, shall be determined as ordered

arrow