logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.02.03 2015고단2635
사기
Text

The defendant is not guilty, and all applications for compensation order are dismissed.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is a person who serves as an insurance designer in the East Life Insurance Co., Ltd.

On May 7, 2001, the Defendant: (a) purchased an “satisfy satisfy insurance II” with the Defendant as the beneficiary of Samsung T&T Insurance Co., Ltd.; (b) 5 insurance companies are highly guaranteed; (c) when hospitalized due to disease and disaster, 23 insurance products covering at least 160,000 won per day to the maximum 270,000 won per day of hospitalization in proportion to the number of days of hospitalization; and (d) when a disease can be sufficiently treated by a hospital, the Defendant was hospitalized into an insurance company with a view to receiving insurance money by receiving documents necessary for receiving insurance money, such as a certificate of admission and discharge, stating that the medical personnel had received proper hospitalization from the hospital, and submitted them to each insurance company for an excessive period of time compared to the appropriate number of days of hospitalization by using one’s own pain treatment disease or claiming false pains; (b) the need for continuous observation of the medical personnel, or even if there is no situation of receiving treatment while staying in the hospital, the Defendant was hospitalized.

The Defendant hospitalized in the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G hospital from October 12, 2007 to December 29 of the same month, and from around 30th of the same month to around November 26 of the same year, the Defendant filed an appeal for brain dead et al. due to a traffic accident with the Ipoid located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H. 46 days in total.

However, in fact, the distance between the dwelling and the hospital of the defendant is not far different from the hospital of the defendant. In fact, G hospital did not have the record of active signs nine times during the period of hospitalization, and the I periodical department did not have the record of active signs at least 11 times on the ground of the record of active signs in the I periodical department, and the period of hospitalization.

arrow