logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.06.13 2013고정2725
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2013, the Defendant is a person who is engaged in Csi driving, and was driving the above vehicle on June 11, 2013, and was driving the 446 Masan-dong, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul at the site of the accident at the speed of speed in the speed of speed in the direction of the next generation from the site of search to the site of an accident.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly observe the signal and prevent the accident from smoke, but the defendant was negligent in failing to comply with it and received the left part of the victim D(53 years old) bus driving ahead of the E-line bus right side of the victim D(53 years old) driving in accordance with the signals from the straight-line bus center.

The Defendant suffered from the injury to the victim D, as follows, on the part of the aforementioned occupational negligence, on the part of the victim as well as on the part of the victim bus passengers: (a) the Defendant suffered from the injury, such as fluoral salt, etc., for about two (2) weeks.

The summary of evidence, such as 2-day knee knee knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne ke kne kne kne ke kne knee knee knee knee kne knee kne kne knee kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne kne k

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness D's testimony;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. Vehicles and on-site photographs;

1. CCTV images of buses;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a written diagnosis and treatment certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant is proceeding three times at the time of the accident.

arrow