logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2021.01.13 2020가단109324
청구이의
Text

1. The Defendant’s Daejeon District Court Branch of Daejeon District Court on April 6, 2010 (Seoul District Court Decision 2009 Gaz. 51370) and the Defendant’s rent.

Reasons

1. The indication of the claim is as shown in the column of “the cause of the claim” in the attached Form.

2. The judgment deeming the confession of the applicable legal provision (Articles 208(3)2, 150(3), and 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act, and the Defendant, upon delivery of the instant complaint, submitted only a formal reply that does not have any substantial reason to dispute the Plaintiff’s claim, and did not appear on the date of pleading. As such, it is deemed that all the Plaintiff’s allegations were led to confession under Article 150 of the Civil Act.

B. According to the records of this case, the defendant's claim against the plaintiff was extinguished due to the completion of prescription as alleged by the plaintiff).

arrow