logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.04.24 2012고단3006
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, who violated the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (sexual traffic) was a female employee of the entertainment tavern “B” and was paid 180,000 won from E around September 21, 2012 at around 23:10,000,000 won for 10,000 won for Dour 102 located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and engaged in sexual intercourse once.

2. On September 21, 2012, around 23:30 on September 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was aware of the fact that the Defendant was a fine during the course of being investigated for sexual traffic in the G police box located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government for suspicion of sexual traffic; (b) stated the name column “H” in the name column, “I” in the resident registration number column, and “H” in the signature column; and (c) forged the Defendant’s personal seal on the next side; and (d) submitted it to the slopingJ of the said police box, which may be aware of the forgery, as genuinely constituted.

Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of exercising a certificate of fact, has forged two copies of a written statement in H’s name, which is a private document related to the certification of fact, and held two copies of the forged private document as above.

3. On September 22, 2012, around 02:19, the Defendant entered “H” in the statement column of the suspect interrogation protocol for the same reason as stated in paragraph (2) at the office of the Intelligent Police Station in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 229, and then forged the Defendant’s signature and submitted it to K as if the circumstances of the said police station knew of the forgery.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged H’s private signature for the purpose of exercising the right, and exercised a forged private signature.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of each statement in the name of H, and each protocol of suspect examination of the police officer of H to statutes;

1. Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense and the Criminal Act.

arrow