logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2016.10.25 2016고단916
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On November 6, 2008, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon branch of the Daegu District Court on November 6, 2008. On December 2, 2008, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon branch of the Daegu District Court on December 2, 2008. On June 9, 2014, the Defendant was notified of a summary order of KRW 6 million as a fine of KRW 1 million.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On June 9, 2016, at around 00:05, the Defendant driven a B-learning car without a driver’s license, under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.078% from the 5km section from the 5km section to the road front of the same Gu road, where the vibration located in the Mag-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si. In addition, the Defendant driven the B-learning car without a driver’s license.

Accordingly, the defendant, who has driven a motor vehicle more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle without a driver's license under the influence of alcohol.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) on the road in front of the Masan Simpo-si Simpo-si Simpo-si Simpo-si, and (b) on the road in front of the Simpo-si Simpo-si Simpo-si; (c) on the Defendant’s pro-friendly E, who was requested to verify personal information in the process of drinking control by police officers belonging to the Msan-gu Police Station C district-gu, Msan-gu, and used “F

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, signed a driver’s signature on the notice of the result of drinking driving control made from a police officer as “Driver E” on the date and place specified in paragraph 2, and signed a digital signature on the name of E.

As a result, the defendant saw the signature of the driver in the traffic police network, which is an electronic record of a certificate of fact, for the purpose of making the affairs of the police officer responsible for drinking control.

arrow