logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.09.07 2016고단2454
협박등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

No person shall allow another person to deliver words, sounds, letters, pictures, images, or other things that may cause sexual humiliation or aversion, by telephone, mail, computer, or any other means of communication, with intent to arouse or satisfy his/her own or another person's sexual desire.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 2016. 1. 2. 11:13경 안산시 상록구 C 401호 피고인의 주거지에서 피해자 D(여, 16세)에게 ‘E’ SNS 메신져를 이용하여 “개보지 노예년아, 오늘 속옷은 무슨색 , 니년 냄새나는 보지에 자지 박히고 싶잖아”라는 등의 글을 수회에 걸쳐 전송하여 피해자에게 성적수치심과 혐오감이 드는 글을 도달하게 하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A complaint filed by the F;

1. The list of seizure;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing communications data gathering;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 13 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, Selection of a fine (including the confession and rebuttal of the accused, the fact that the accused has agreed with the injured party, the fact that the accused is the primary offender, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 21 (2) and (4) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of the proviso to Article 49 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse and the proviso to Article 50 (1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (the disclosure and notification of personal information shall not be made, taking into account the initial offender, age, family relationship, outline, etc

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. The summary of the facts charged in this part of the charges is to block the Defendant’s ID (H) without any conversation using the “E” SNS with the Defendant, which was known through the hosting of mobile phone display SNS (social network services) at the Defendant’s residence at Ansan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, Masan-si, Mansan-si, on October 2015.

arrow