Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is engaged in rocketing taxi driving service.

On December 29, 2017, the Defendant moved bypass the two-lanes of the two-lanes in front of the gas station E, which is located in the Gu, in Ansan-si, around 23:05, in accordance with two-lanes from the part of the elementary school which was a grix of the Constitution of the Republic of Korea.

At the time, there are nights, and at the front of the crosswalks, so it is well examined whether a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle is a pedestrian crossing, and when a pedestrian is passing a crosswalk, he/she has a duty of care to temporarily stop in front of the crosswalks so as not to obstruct or endanger the crossing of the pedestrian.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to take part in the right side of the victim F (the age of 40) who crosses the crosswalk of the pedestrian green line from the right side of the Defendant’s running direction to the left side, received the right side side of the victim F (the age of 40) from the front part of the above taxi, and caused the victim to go beyond the floor, thereby causing the victim to suffer injury, such as light bucks, boness, and strings, which require approximately 8 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of vehicles, on-site photographs, and photographic images of black stuffs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents Aggravated Punishment, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is due to the fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is due to the defendant’s gross negligence - The fact that the victim suffered significant injury due to the defendant’s gross negligence - the favorable circumstances are against the defendant’s mistake, the fact that the defendant is subscribed to a personal taxi mutual aid association across the country, the victim does not want to be punished against the defendant, and the sentence is