All appeals by the defendant against the first and second original judgment are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for five months) and that of the second judgment of the court of the first instance for the accused (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for five months) are too unreasonable.

2. The defendant filed an appeal against the judgment of the court of first and second instances and tried both at the trial. Since the judgment of the court of second and second instances only sentenced the defendant to a fine against the defendant, the defendant cannot be punished more severe punishment than this in the trial in light of the principle of prohibition of disadvantageous alteration. As examined below, unless the court of first and second instances select all criminal facts of the judgment of the court of second and did not sentence one punishment, it does not constitute a ground for reversal of the judgment of the court below on the ground of consolidated examination itself. Thus, the judgment of the court below is not reversed on the ground of consolidated examination, and the grounds for appeal against the first and second judgment of the court of first and

The judgment of the court of first instance is recognized to recognize and reflect all criminal facts, and even if it is recognized that the above victims do not want punishment against the defendant by mutual agreement between the victims and the victims until the court of original judgment, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crimes, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that may be considered in sentencing after the judgment of the court below was rendered, and other various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., are not deemed unfair because the sentence of the court below is too excessive. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

B. Although the defendant's judgment on the second judgment of the court below recognizes and reflects the criminal facts, the crime is not good in light of the contents of the crime, and no agreement is reached with the victim, and the defendant several times as the same crime.