1. The Defendant received KRW 167,100 from the Plaintiff, and then Jeju District Court rendered the Jeju District Court with respect to the area of KRW 454.3 square meters in Jeju-si.

1. On July 1, 2008, the Plaintiff: (a) leased an E store among the buildings located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul; (b) concluded a franchise agreement with the Defendant to extend the term of the contract on July 5, 2013 to the end of June 29, 2015; and (c) subsequently, the term of the contract expires.

7. 16. An agreement was reached between the Plaintiff and building owners on the extension of the franchise agreement to the effect that “The extension of the franchise agreement was agreed to be extended until the lease agreement becomes final and conclusive, on the grounds that there was no agreement on the lease deposit and rent, as the situation where the extension of store and the lease agreement were in progress at the same time.”

According to Article 59 of the franchise agreement of this case, expenses for restoration following the termination of the franchise agreement are, in principle, borne by the plaintiff who is the managing owner, and the defendant is required to bear the removal costs only when the franchise agreement is terminated due to

The Plaintiff’s lease deposit amounting to KRW 2 million, KRW 15.1 million per month, between G Co., Ltd. and the owner at the time of June 25, 2013, and the period of KRW 1.5 million per month, between the Plaintiff and G Co., Ltd.

7. From January 1 to June 30, 2014, a lease contract was concluded by setting a period for renewal on a yearly basis, and on June 29, 2015, when the ownership of the building was transferred to H Co., Ltd. as of June 29, 2015, a letter of commitment to the effect that “where a new lessee wishes to rent the whole building, he/she shall promptly deliver E-ho stores” between H and H, and on January 21, 2016, the term of lease for I stores of the building.

1. For five years from January 1, 200, 38 million won of lease deposit (a balance of lease deposit in an E shop shall be appropriated as a part thereof, and the unpaid rent in an E shop was settled) and the lease contract was concluded retroactively as of December 30, 2015, however, H asserted that the lease contract was terminated in an E shop and the termination of the lease contract in an E shop was sought against the Plaintiff on February 18, 2016.