logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.01.15 2015고합187
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(횡령)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for a term of three years and six months, imprisonment for a term of two years, and imprisonment for a term of one year and six months, for a term of one year and six months.

(b).

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around March 2004, he/she joined the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government L2 (hereinafter referred to as the "G") and worked as the head of the business team, while working as the head of the business team from September 1, 2009 to June 30, 2012, and is a person who is in the middle and high automobile business division of G from July 1, 2012 to January 2015, and is in the middle and high automobile business division of H Co., Ltd. on the second floor of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M (hereinafter referred to as the "H") and is in the middle and high automobile business division of the said company.

Defendant

B is not only the representative director of G from June 1, 2005 to December 31, 2009, the director of G from January 1, 2010 to the managing director of G in charge of vehicle operation and maintenance affairs, but also the representative director in charge of G from May 1, 2012 to December 9, 2014. A person who has been in charge of the actual general manager in charge of H’s business operation and maintenance, vehicle purchase and sale, and management of branch offices.

Defendant

C is a person who has been engaged in the issuance and accounting of vehicle-related documents from around 2008 to December 12, 2014 as the head of G management department.

1. The Defendants’ joint crime committed by the Defendants committed the following acts: (a) while the victims’ G with the main force of a new and medium-sized business from G and the victim H had been transferred to the main business sector of the second and high-speed business from G, the Defendant Company, the holding company of the victim Company, was led to the victims’ new business sector of G and neglected to manage the second and second business sector; and (b) Defendant A received the purchase price of the vehicle from the new bank account (Account Number:O) and the national bank account (Account Number:P) and kept the vehicle; and (c) Defendant C arbitrarily issued the necessary documents before the vehicle; (d) Defendant B, the representative of the victim Company, determined the purchase price of the vehicle and the amount of embezzlement to be reported to the victim Company, and share each of the duties, such as sharing the amount of embezzlement and embezzlement.

arrow