logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.12.15 2017고합246
특수상해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the victim C(n, 60 tax) and the legal marital relationship.

1. On October 30, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 01:30, Seocheon-si Do Do Do Do Do 201, the Defendant: (b) asked the victim of the instant computer Do Do Do Do Do 201 on the ground that the victim did not receive a telephone on the ground that Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do was her was her out; (c) asked the victim of the instant computer Do Do Do Do Do pl; (d) Do fro Do Do Do fro, which was a dangerous thing for the victim’s use of the instant computer Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do , and (d) Do

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles with the victim and inflicted an injury on the victim.

2. The Defendant, who discharges gas, shall die to the victim for the same reason at the time and place described in paragraph 1.

After having become sound, gas valves in a ward using the above bar flass are separated from gas valves, thereby emitting gas for about five minutes, thereby causing danger to human life, body, or property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The victim's side photographs and gas pipeline form for damage;

1. Application of the existing Acts and subordinate statutes of confiscated flass (No. 1)

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) (a point of special injury) of the Criminal Act and Article 172-2 (1) (a point of gas emission) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (the aggravated punishment for concurrent crimes prescribed for the crimes of gas emissions which are heavier than the aggravated punishment);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of the defense counsel under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Community Service and Order to Attend Education, and Article 62-2(1) of the same Act, the Defendant and the defense counsel had a mental and physical weakness by drinking the Defendant

The argument is asserted.

this Court.

arrow