The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant was not guilty of committing an indecent act against the victim, as stated in the instant facts charged.

even if there was a physical contact with the victim who was seated next to the bus.

Even if the defendant was locked, there is an intention to commit the act because it is likely that the defendant would have been lockedly.

shall not be deemed to exist.

B. The sentence of the lower court’s unfair sentencing (an amount of KRW 3 million, and an order to complete a sexual assault program 40 hours) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

가. 사실 오인 주장에 대하여 원심에서 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 아래와 같은 사실관계 및 사정들 즉, ① 피해자는 수사기관에서부터 원심에 이르기까지 이 사건 공소사실 기재와 같은 추행을 당하게 된 경위 및 과정, 내용, 그 전후의 상황 등에 대하여 비교적 구체적이고 일관되게 진술하고 있는 점, ② 피해자는 이 사건 발생 직후에 버스에서 내려 추행을 당한 것에 대해 경찰에 신고를 하였는데 신고 경위나 신고 내용이 특별히 꾸밈이 없고 자연스럽다고

(3) There is sufficient motive for the victim to make a false statement even when the victim is expected to be subject to criminal punishment, as there is a space between the defendant and the victim without a single face-to-face identification.

(4) In full view of the facts charged in the instant case, the victim stated that “the Defendant repeatedly bucks down the victim’s left side and bucks up to hand,” and that it is difficult to see that the bucks were sucks, as alleged by the Defendant, in light of the content, method, frequency, etc. of the prosecution, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim as described in the instant facts charged.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is rejected.

B. As to the wrongful argument of sentencing, the Defendant recognized the instant crime.