A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 9, 2012, the Defendant posted the name tag in the name of “D” office of the Defendant’s operation in Ansan-si, the date of payment under the name of “D” issued by the Defendant, on May 22, 2012, and on the back pages of the Promissory Notes (bill No. E) with the face value of KRW 30,000,000 at the face value, which is the branch of the branch of the Dong branch of the Bank in the country of payment, and without authority, placed “G”, “F (State)”, and “HN6 EM”, etc. stored in the F office located in the same building as “D”, without authority, for the purpose of exercising.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged an endorsement under the name of F, a statement on the rights and obligations of a promissory note, which is a securities.

2. The Defendant, on the same day as in the preceding paragraph, lent to I, at the same place, a promissory note which forged an endorsement as above, was delivered as if it were genuine.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement 1, and the witness J's legal statement;

1. Statement to J police officers;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of statutes on copies of promissory notes;

1. Relevant Article 214(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Articles 217 and 214(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising counterfeited securities) of the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

2. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

3. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of the defendant and defense counsel under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution (the defendant has no record of being punished more severe than a fine, and there are other circumstances such as the circumstances of the crime of this case and the circumstances after the crime) and Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Korea. However, the defendant's endorsement of the promissory note of this case in the absence of theJ is true, but the defendant's prior and implied consent is obtained from theJ, and it is not so.