Defendant

A Imprisonment for eight months, each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who is engaged in a small-scale building business under the trade name of “E,” Defendant B is a daily worker, Defendant C is a pro-friendly type of Defendant A, and the representative director of G Co., Ltd. located in the Gyeong-gu, North America.

Defendant

A around March 1, 2013, around 2013, contracted to construct a multi-purpose warehouse in the orchard H in the Cheongong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and there was an accident that the construction of a multi-purpose warehouse in the said orchard was carried out by the owner of the building, while employing the said B and carrying out the construction work for the contact with the said warehouse, etc., around 09:40, the said B went away from the bridge after the contact.

However, Defendant A was an individual constructor who has no construction license and did not subscribe to the industrial accident insurance, and thus, Defendant A could not process the above accident as an industrial accident, notwithstanding the fact that Defendant A could not process the above accident as an industrial accident.

Defendant

A around 11:00 on April 1, 2013, around 11:00, requested the defendant C, who is his relative, to handle the above warehouse construction as an industrial accident by manipulating documents by directly managing the construction of the warehouse from G, and the defendant C also accepted the proposal of the defendant C.

After that, Defendant A, who was hospitalized in J Hospital, stated that he would be treated as an industrial accident by pretending that he directly managed the construction work in G, and that he would apply for the medical expenses, etc. by pretending that he is a worker in the above B is a worker in G, etc., Defendant A conspired to receive industrial accident compensation insurance money by deceiving the Victim’s Labor Welfare Corporation.

Defendant A and C directly manage the construction work in the above accident site in G in accordance with the above public offering. Defendant A and Defendant B are the site manager of G, Defendant B are the daily workers of G, and Defendant B falsely prepares a construction standard contract, etc. as if they were to work as daily workers of G, and submit it to the Korea Labor Welfare Corporation Dong branch office around April 2013, and Defendant B also has the aforementioned false contents around May 10, 2013.