logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.05.18 2017고정887
근로기준법위반등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. In addition to replacing the person against whom the facts charged in the instant case are charged to the defendant, it is as shown in the attached Form.

2. The above facts charged are each of the crimes falling under Articles 109(1) and 36 of the Labor Standards Act, and Articles 44 subparag. 1 and 9 of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act, and is not prosecuted against the victim’s explicit intent pursuant to Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act, the proviso of Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits Act.

According to the statement of withdrawal of each complaint filed in the trial records, the victims expressed their wish not to punish the defendant on February 10, 2017.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow