logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2020.05.22 2018고단1126 (1)
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 29, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor at the Incheon District Court for fraud, etc. and completed the execution of the above punishment on January 25, 2016. On March 22, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for an attempted escape, etc. at the Suwon District Court, and the above judgment was rendered for the same year.

8.1. The judgment became final and conclusive on August 10, 2017, which became final and conclusive on January 5, 2018.

The Defendant and B are so-called “work loan” so-called “business loan,” which makes it possible to grant a loan by manipulating the false certificate of employment, false benefit details, etc. to those who are unable to obtain a loan because they fail to meet the loan conditions, and C is a person who has provided the above Broer with the name of the lender who actually proceeds from the loan despite being aware that the loan is impossible due to a failure

On May 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a loan from C in the name of B, C, and B, at the entrance of B, and B, in the name of B, and B, where it is impossible to meet the terms and conditions of the loan due to lack of workplace or particular income; (b) received 25% of the loan from C, and (c) paid 3 million won per month to the Defendant; (c) introduced B to the Defendant; (d) registered as a staff of D, which was established by the Defendant for the working loan of C, and conspired to obtain a loan from the victim lending company in the name of C.

On June 9, 2016, the Defendant filed an application for workplace loan with the victim E corporation in the name of Daejeon (Seoul) and submitted a loan transaction agreement under the name of C and a written confirmation of the health insurance eligibility acquisition status of C as the employment-provided policyholder of D company, and filed an application for a loan as if C actually worked in the said D company.

However, in fact C does not have worked in the D Company, and the said D Company is a company established falsely to obtain a loan, and the F that was carried out as a surety to obtain a loan in the name of C is only a company.

arrow