(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.02.17 2016고정19

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.02.17 2016고정19

상해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On October 14, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor at the Changwon District Court for fraud, etc., and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 18, 2015.

[Criminal facts] [2016 High Court 19] The defendant is between the victim B and his/her husband and wife under law.

On May 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) 21:30 around Kimhae-si C and Dora 201, and (b) 1:30 around 22, 2015, the Defendant sent letters to the victim who did not talk with the victim and did not give any answer; (c) on the day of the instant case, the Defendant sent letters to the victim who did not talk with the victim, but did not give any answer; and (d) 4 times the victim’s meals to the mate president, who was working for the victim as her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of her part of 21:30;

As a result, two parts, internal part, chins, chins, chins, and straws that need to be treated for a period of 14 days to the victim.

[2016 High Court Decision 48]

1. On July 7, 2015, the Defendant expressed a letter to the effect that the Defendant sold a medium and high-TV in the city near the Gu-U.S. Si around July 7, 2015, the Defendant expressed his/her intent to the effect that “the Defendant will send a stack TV on the following day to the victim D who reported and contacted the said letter.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to send the said TV even if he received the money.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received 250,000 won from the victim to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (E) in the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

2. On July 8, 2015, the Defendant expressed a letter to the effect that he/she sells heavy and high TV, such as the preceding paragraph, in the vicinity of the Kumi-si around July 8, 2015, the Defendant expressed his/her intent to the effect that the Defendant would send to the victim F who reported and contacted the above letter “on the face of the week, he/she would remit the price to the next day.”

However, the defendant is willing or ability to send the said TV even if he/she receives the money.

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 2016.02.17 2015고정1370

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2017.09.27 2017고단229

-인천지방법원 2016.06.30 2016고단1055

-부산지방법원 2018.04.16 2017고단4235

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.01.17 2017고단5032