beta
Text
The part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the following portions of the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked, and such cancellation shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is as follows, with the exception of the following dismissal or addition, the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is as follows (main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act). 3rd below, “O” means “O (O, an individual company, but for convenience” hereinafter).
The 4th five to six parallels “I to B, etc.” are referred to as “I from February 2013 to April 2016 to R Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “R”) respectively.
6 Under the 6th day, “A” and “A” shall be deemed to be “liability for damages caused by a violation”.
7 The phrase “3,063,120,504 Won” and “392,67,929 Won upon partial claims” of the 7th two parallels shall be deemed to read “1,253,575,480 Won”.
7 The following shall be added between 3 and 4:
“2) In addition, the Plaintiff was unable to directly supply low density PCB to I as above, and R did not supply them once. As such, the transaction with I and R did not correspond to the Plaintiff’s business opportunity but supplied P to I and R.
In this case, damage to the plaintiff was inflicted.
shall not be deemed to exist.
'3 '2' below the 7th day and the 8th day and 2 '8 '2'.
Then, the Plaintiff suffered losses that the Plaintiff could not supply by supplying low density PCB to I and R.
Even if the amount of actual profit of the Plaintiff, the amount of damages, is not in excess of the amount calculated by taking into account the Plaintiff’s low density PCB’s business profit ratio before the establishment of P, or the sales of P’s I and R.
“” shall be added.
8 The 8th three parallel parts are “a judgment on the claim for damages due to the violation of the duty to prohibit the utilization of business opportunities.”
9. The sales amount between 9-8 and 9 was “,” and the relationship with I was aggravated, and the low-density PCB was not supplied to I as before.
However, the plaintiff's low density PCB project is turned into "."
i. 9.