Defendants shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

The premise case of perjury is the Chairperson of L party Mountainous District Party Maga, who is the victim O (63 tax) who was a full-time adviser of L party Magaz. who returned to the 18th president election since 8.15:30 on December 18, 2012, completed the 18th president presidential election related to the Seoul N. Seoul N. 8.31 on December 18, 2012.

For the reason that finland was finland, finland and finland was discarded.

The former summary type was charged on November 20, 2014, on the charge that the victim’s balp dumd and dumd, etc. had inflicted an injury on the O, such as cump salt, which requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and was pronounced not guilty on November 20, 2014, Seoul Central District Court 2013 and 3836, but the appellate court was sentenced to a fine of KRW 700,000 as the Seoul Central District Court 2014 No. 4829 on July 2, 2015, but the appeal was dismissed as the Supreme Court Decision 2015Do1145 on November 26, 2015 and became final and conclusive guilty.

Criminal facts

1. On April 8, 2014, around 15:00, Defendant A appeared and taken an oath in the Seoul Central District Court 408, Seocho-ro, Seoul, Seocho-gu, Seoul, 157, as a witness of the above injury case, at the Seoul Central District Court 408, Seocho-ro, Seocho-gu, Seoul, and the Defendant appeared as a witness of the above injury case, and the defense counsel’s “a summary of

I cannot answer the question "..."

From the place where the defendant was seated to the O, the witness who was seated by the defendant must be laid and opened, and the witness (B) and the people started to prevent the O.

I expressed my desire to each other, and tried to prevent the Defendant from reporting the power atmosphere as well as to prevent the people, although the Defendant had expressed his intention by interested and decomposing.

He answer “,” and “I do not answer to the question “I do not see the fact that the person who made this bath is fulbling and sathering.”

The answer was made by the Prosecutor, “I have no physical contact for a long time, and only speaks with each other, and Defendant (K) only takes a bath at a remote distance.”

c) answer “”; and