Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, with respect to the defendant A, it shall be for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On August 13, 2010, the sentence of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. (sexual traffic mediation, etc.) is imposed on August 13, 201 and the above sentence becomes final and conclusive on December 31 of the same year, and is currently in the grace period.

The Defendants conspired, from March 18, 201 to March 26, 2011, the Defendants, in collusion, engaged in commercial sex acts by employing F as a commercial sex acts woman at the business establishment in the name of Shin Chang-so-soon 43, which is operated by the Defendants from March 18, 201 to March 26, 201, with the total amount of KRW 870,000,000 for 10-1550,000 per time, and arranging commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the police investigation of suspect with regard to F;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: The provisions of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning criminal records, previous records of disposition and report on results of confirmation (80 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B is sentenced to punishment in light of the fact that there are many criminal records of the same kind, and that Defendant A again commits the instant crime during the suspension period of execution following the punishment, under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. (1/2, 435,000 of the price of sexual traffic subject to additional collection, which is equally divided by Defendant). Defendant A is sentenced to punishment in consideration of the following: although there are two criminal records of the same kind, the same kind of fine is imposed; however, Defendant A is sentenced to punishment in consideration of the period of the instant crime, frequency, the degree of