logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.08.18 2015구합12163
건축허가불허가처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, on July 31, 2015, filed an application for a building permit with the Defendant on July 31, 2015, in order to newly construct three dongs for land guidance with a total floor area of 7,719 square meters and a total floor area of 3,360 square meters on the ground of the instant application site, as the owner of F (hereinafter “F”) 1,425 square meters in G, Hant 3,137 square meters in size, 1,269 square meters in size, Jant 1,348 square meters in size (hereinafter “instant application site”).

B. On November 24, 2015, the Defendant rendered a disposition rejecting the application on the ground that “the instant application is part of the agricultural promotion zone and production management zone, and there is concern about under Article 58 of the National Land Planning and Utilization Act (hereinafter “National Land Planning Act”) and Article 56 and [Attachment 1-2] of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act, that there is a concern about undermining the dwelling and living environment, environmental pollution, and hazards in the rural area, and that there is concern about the inconvenience of residents in their lives and impeding the promotion of public welfare by submitting a flexible supplement measures to secure teaching facilities necessary for driving vehicles and install malodor preventive facilities.” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

C. The Intervenors (Appointeds) and the designated parties are residents living in the vicinity of the instant application site.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Eul evidence No. 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

가. 원고의 주장 1) 이 사건 신청지 인근에는 주거지역이 존재하지 아니하고, 원고가 신축하려는 계사는 창문이 없이 환기구를 통하여 환기가 이루어지는 이른바 무창계사(無窓鷄舍)로서 악취, 분진 등이 거의 발생하지 아니하므로 환경피해에 관한 피고의 처분사유는 이유 없다. 2) 이 사건 신청지의 진입도로는 콘크리트로 포장이 되어 있고, 폭이 좁아 교행이 어려운 부분은 농로로 이용되는 도로로 원고는 피고의 요구로 교행시설 1곳을 설치할 예정이며 그 외 교행가능한...

arrow