A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:00 on September 2, 2012, the Defendant, in collaboration with C, led the handcule, which was previously lent to the fronter of the residence of the victim E, who was in the 2nd place of the business. The Defendant, in collaboration with C, led the handcule, and the Defendant, in its possession, led the handcule to the handcule, the sum of the market prices of the victim’s possession, which was kept in custody by the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property together with C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Article 331 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Determination of the same sentence as the order shall be made in consideration of the matters prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the absence of criminal records against the defendant for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act, the amount of damage, and the return of damaged articles to the owner;