Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, the two years each from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. A. On August 6, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driven a e-burged vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of approximately 500 meters from the 500-meter section to the police box, while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.119% in blood, if the Defendant was from the front side of the terminal parking lot of a cross-city bus located in the Scamban city to the Gyeongsi-si, if he was a Sinsan-si, the Defendant driven a e-burged vehicle.

B. On August 6, 2016, the Defendant was also the offender at G cafeteria located in the Cheongdo-gun F, Cheongdo-gun on August 6, 2016 to B, who is the Defendant’s restaurant customer.

A person who drives on behalf of another person;

The revocation of drinking shall not be made at the request of a person who makes a statement.

If drinking is revoked, the cafeteria should be able to make a false statement only once. The request was made by B to "......."

On August 12, 2016, at around 09:52, the Defendant instigated the Defendant to avoid committing a crime by having B make a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, while driving a vehicle of sofried from E, and the Defendant was not driving at all,” at the H department office of the G department of the Hasan Police Station, which was 68 at the time of Busan Special Metropolitan City, by having B attend an investigation as a witness.

2. Defendant B is a customer of a restaurant operated by A, who was aware of the fact that he was a customer of the restaurant run by A and three years.

As described in paragraph 1, the above A has driven an A-to-pur motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

While the Defendant knew that he had driven alcohol as above, the Defendant made a false statement to I as if the Defendant had driven alcohol at the H department office of the G department of the G department of the Gyeongsan Police Station, which was 68 at the time of Busan Special Metropolitan City, on August 12, 2016, when he had been investigating the above case.

In the end, the defendant had a person who committed a crime subject to a fine or heavier punishment escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Fact-finding reports on drivers of drinking alcohol and inquiry into the results of crackdown on drinking alcohol driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographable CCTV drivers;

1. Criminal facts;