1. Designated goods A of a trademark registration among a trial decision rendered by the Intellectual Property Tribunal on August 13, 2014 with respect to cases No. 2013-Ma2336.

1. Basic facts

(a) 1) Registration number/filing date/registration date: 3) Designated goods: Mascing, gel for massages, skin scambling, hair-keeping and treatment products, beauty shampching, shampching, pharmaceutical products for disinfection, unmedical cambling, cosmetics business, meclat, masclcing, mack-cking, blishing, eyebling, eyebbl, ladles, clocking, click-making, click-making, flick-making, 3) : Mascambling, scambling, scaming, scaming, gymping, gymping, gymping, gyming, stamp standards, shamp-making, e.g., e., e., g., e., e. g., e., g.

C. On August 27, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a petition for a trial to invalidate the registration of the instant registered trademark with the Intellectual Property Tribunal on the ground that it falls under Article 7(1)7, 9, 9, 11, and 12 of the Trademark Act and falls under the scope of Article 7(1)9 of the Trademark Act, and thus, the instant registered trademark does not fall under Article 7(1)9, 11, and 12 of the Trademark Act in relation to the pre-registered trademark, etc. and falls under Article 7(1)7 of the Trademark Act in relation to the pre-registered trademark, etc.