logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2016.06.24 2015고단1199
상해
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The Defendant is the Director General of the Planning Headquarters of the Gyeongnam Marine Industry Trade Union C.

At around 12:30 on June 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) reported that the victim D, who supported a new old-age care at the entrance of the Korea Coast Guard Center 25, would leave the existing old-age crew members, has been working on the roads; and (b) reported that “D, width, and so on” was working for the Defendant.

Before taking the bath as “this arbling,” the ebbbbage was prevented, and 2-3 times the left side of the arbage was drinking.

As a result, the defendant added 7-8 times to the left side of the victim in need of four weeks of medical treatment, such as lives, lives, and lives.

2. Determination

A. The burden of proof for the crime prosecuted in a criminal trial is to be borne by a public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence with probative value that leads a judge to feel true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt as to the defendant's guilt, it is inevitable to determine the defendant's interest as the defendant's interest even if there is a suspicion as to the defendant (see Supreme Court Decision 2009Do1151, Jul. 22, 2010, etc.). (b) There is a police and court statement, E and F's own police statement, injury diagnosis statement, but this court's duly adopted evidence alone is difficult to recognize the facts charged, and the remaining evidence submitted by the public prosecutor alone is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(1) The injured party, at the police station, deemed that he/she dumbbling from the accused and drinking him/her, as described in the facts charged.

In the court, the court first made a statement that the Defendant was able to catch the belts from the Defendant.

After making a statement, I changed the statement that it is appropriate for the prosecutor to catch balths in the prosecutor's cadastral records.

(2)

arrow