logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2012.11.22 2012고단6666
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months;

2. 10,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

On August 7, 2012, at around 19:00, the Defendant administered philophones by inserting 0.03 g of psychotropic drugs in a single-use injection machine, and in an injection into the right arms at the Defendant’s house located in Youngdo-gu, Busan and 206 Do-1808.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation report (with regard to response to a request for appraisal);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (calculated additional charges);

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) 1, and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 of the Act on the Selection and Management of Narcotics, Etc., and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

2. Grounds for sentencing in the proviso to Article 67 of the Act on the Control of Narcotics Additional Collection.

1. Persons who are under special mitigation [decision of types of punishment] Application of the standards for punishment and punishment [decision of types of punishment] 3 types of crimes, such as medication and simple possession of drugs among the narcotics crime group (excluding persons under special mitigation] : None of the basic areas of punishment [the scope of recommending punishment]: Imprisonment with prison labor for not less than 10 months to not more than 2 years [general person]: A person under general mitigation (not less than 3 years to not more than 10 years), or a person under general mitigation of any repeated crime of this kind: A confession and reflect (decision of sentence of punishment] A confession and reflectivity (decision of sentence of punishment), and a person under general mitigation of any repeated crime of this kind: A sentence shall be determined as per the disposition beyond the sentencing criteria, taking into account the following factors:

2. Application of the criteria for probation [Main Grounds for Suspension of Execution] Main prides: None of the main grounds for probation that the main grounds for non-existence of the grounds for probation: [Decision on the territory of recommendation] No (Decision on the area of recommendation] and all of the grounds for choice of probation [General Witnesses for Suspension of Execution]: The grounds for general pride of probation: The confession and the grounds for general pride of probation: At least twice in the area of recommendation, the scope of which has been decided on whether to suspend probation should be determined as per the disposition, comprehensively

arrow